NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B vs Llama 3.1 70B: Benchmark Comparison
Detailed comparison of NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B and Llama 3.1 70B covering benchmarks, pricing, context window, and compliance.
Key Specifications
| Specification | NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B | Llama 3.1 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | other | meta |
| Version | nvidia-llama-3-1-nemotron-70b | 3.1-70b |
| Release Date | 2024-10-17 | 2024-07-23 |
| Context Window | 131072 tokens | 128000 tokens |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
| License | Llama 3.1 Community License | Llama 3 Community License |
| SOC2 | ✗ | ✗ |
| HIPAA | ✗ | ✗ |
| GDPR | ✗ | ✗ |
| ISO 27001 | ✗ | ✗ |
Benchmark Results
| Benchmark | NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B | Llama 3.1 70B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 93.2 | 92.3 | NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B |
| BBH | 76.6 | 70.2 | NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B |
| GPQA | 37.6 | 40 | Llama 3.1 70B |
| GSM8K | 77.8 | 78.8 | Llama 3.1 70B |
| HUMANEVAL | 66.4 | 79.7 | Llama 3.1 70B |
| IFEVAL | 69.6 | 73.7 | Llama 3.1 70B |
| MATH | 40.3 | 38.5 | NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B |
| MMLU | 80.4 | 75.6 | NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B |
| MUSR | 47.7 | 48.1 | Llama 3.1 70B |
| WINOGRANDE | 84.7 | 81 | NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B |
Pricing Comparison
| Tier (per Mtok) | NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B | Llama 3.1 70B |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $0.9 | $0.9 |
| Output | $0.9 | $0.9 |
| Cache Read | $0 | $0 |
| Cache Write | $0 | $0 |
NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B против Llama 3.1 70B
Обзор модели
NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B and Llama 3.1 70B are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.
Ключевые характеристики
| Поставщик | Дата выпуска | Окно контекста | Лицензия |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other / Meta | 2024-10-17 / 2024-07-23 | 131K / 128K | Llama 3.1 Community License / Llama 3 Community License |
Производительность
| Бенчмарк | NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B | Llama 3.1 70B | Победитель |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 93.2 | 92.3 | A |
| BBH (BIG-Bench Hard) | 76.6 | 70.2 | A |
| GPQA | 37.6 | 40.0 | B |
| GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K) | 77.8 | 78.8 | B |
| HumanEval | 66.4 | 79.7 | B |
| IFEval | 69.6 | 73.7 | B |
| MATH | 40.3 | 38.5 | A |
| MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) | 80.4 | 75.6 | A |
| MUSR | 47.7 | 48.1 | Tie |
| WinoGrande | 84.7 | 81.0 | A |
Сравнение цен
| Вход | Выход | Чтение кэша | Запись кэша |
|---|---|---|---|
| — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
за миллион токенов — A / B
Сильные стороны & Слабые стороны
NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B
- ✅ MMLU score 80.4, strong knowledge reasoning.
- ⚠️ 闭源专有模型，不支持自托管。
Llama 3.1 70B
- ✅ 可靠的通用模型。
- ⚠️ 闭源专有模型，不支持自托管。
Мнение редактора
NVIDIA Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B and Llama 3.1 70B each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.
ЧЗВ
Which model is better for coding tasks?
Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.
Which model is cheaper?
Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.
Which has a longer context window?
Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.
Ссылки
Editor's Take
See Editor's Take section.