Key Specifications

SpecificationGrok-2Claude 3 Opus
Vendorxaianthropic
Version23-opus
Release Date2024-08-132024-03-04
Context Window131072 tokens200000 tokens
Input Modalitiestext, imagetext, image
Output Modalitiestexttext
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
SOC2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001

Benchmark Results

BenchmarkGrok-2Claude 3 OpusWinner
ARC94.5Claude 3 Opus
BBH8481.6Grok-2
GPQA46Claude 3 Opus
GSM8K93.291.8Grok-2
HUMANEVAL88.483.3Grok-2
IFEVAL79.2Claude 3 Opus
MATH76.842.7Grok-2
MMLU87.581.2Grok-2
MUSR53.3Claude 3 Opus
WINOGRANDE81.9Claude 3 Opus

Pricing Comparison

Tier (per Mtok)Grok-2Claude 3 Opus
Input$2$15
Output$10$75
Cache Read$0$0
Cache Write$0$0

Grok-2 против Claude 3 Opus

Обзор модели

Grok-2 and Claude 3 Opus are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.

Ключевые характеристики

ПоставщикДата выпускаОкно контекстаЛицензия
Xai / Anthropic2024-08-13 / 2024-03-04131K / 200KProprietary / Proprietary

Производительность

БенчмаркGrok-2Claude 3 OpusПобедитель
ARC94.5B
BBH (BIG-Bench Hard)84.081.6A
GPQA46.0B
GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K)93.291.8A
HumanEval88.483.3A
IFEval79.2B
MATH76.842.7A
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding)87.581.2A
MUSR53.3B
WinoGrande81.9B

Сравнение цен

ВходВыходЧтение кэшаЗапись кэша
— / —— / —— / —— / —

за миллион токенов — A / B

Сильные стороны & Слабые стороны

Grok-2

  • ✅ MMLU score 87.5, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 88.4, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 93.2, robust math reasoning.
  • ✅ 支持文本、图像、音频多模态输入。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Claude 3 Opus

  • ✅ MMLU score 81.2, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 83.3, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 91.8, robust math reasoning.
  • ✅ 支持文本、图像、音频多模态输入。
  • ✅ 上下文窗口 200K,支持长文本。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Мнение редактора

Grok-2 and Claude 3 Opus each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.

ЧЗВ

Which model is better for coding tasks?

Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.

Which model is cheaper?

Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.

Which has a longer context window?

Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.

Ссылки

Editor's Take

See Editor's Take section.