Key Specifications

SpecificationGemini 1.5 ProDeepSeek V3
Vendorgoogledeepseek
Version1.5-prov3
Release Date2024-02-152024-12-26
Context Window2e+06 tokens64000 tokens
Input Modalitiestext, image, audio, videotext
Output Modalitiestexttext
LicenseProprietaryDeepSeek License
SOC2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001

Benchmark Results

BenchmarkGemini 1.5 ProDeepSeek V3Winner
BBH8484.9DeepSeek V3
GSM8K91.789.3Gemini 1.5 Pro
HUMANEVAL71.982.6DeepSeek V3
MATH58.561.6DeepSeek V3
MMLU85.988.5DeepSeek V3

Pricing Comparison

Tier (per Mtok)Gemini 1.5 ProDeepSeek V3
Input$1.25$0.27
Output$5$1.1
Cache Read$0.3125$0.07
Cache Write$1.25$0.27

Gemini 1.5 Pro против DeepSeek V3

Обзор модели

Gemini 1.5 Pro and DeepSeek V3 are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.

Ключевые характеристики

ПоставщикДата выпускаОкно контекстаЛицензия
Google / Deepseek2024-02-15 / 2024-12-262000K / 64KProprietary / DeepSeek License

Производительность

БенчмаркGemini 1.5 ProDeepSeek V3Победитель
BBH (BIG-Bench Hard)84.084.9B
GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K)91.789.3A
HumanEval71.982.6B
MATH58.561.6B
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding)85.988.5B

Сравнение цен

ВходВыходЧтение кэшаЗапись кэша
— / —— / —— / —— / —

за миллион токенов — A / B

Сильные стороны & Слабые стороны

Gemini 1.5 Pro

  • ✅ MMLU score 85.9, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ GSM8K 91.7, robust math reasoning.
  • ✅ 支持文本、图像、音频多模态输入。
  • ✅ 上下文窗口 2000K,支持长文本。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

DeepSeek V3

  • ✅ MMLU score 88.5, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 82.6, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 89.3, robust math reasoning.
  • ✅ 采用 MoE 混合专家架构。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Мнение редактора

Gemini 1.5 Pro and DeepSeek V3 each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.

ЧЗВ

Which model is better for coding tasks?

Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.

Which model is cheaper?

Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.

Which has a longer context window?

Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.

Ссылки

Editor's Take

See Editor's Take section.