Gemini 1.5 Flash vs Llama 3.1 8B: Benchmark Comparison
Detailed comparison of Gemini 1.5 Flash and Llama 3.1 8B covering benchmarks, pricing, context window, and compliance.
Key Specifications
| Specification | Gemini 1.5 Flash | Llama 3.1 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | meta | |
| Version | 1.5-flash | 3.1-8b |
| Release Date | 2024-05-14 | 2024-07-23 |
| Context Window | 1e+06 tokens | 128000 tokens |
| Input Modalities | text, image, audio, video | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
| License | Proprietary | Llama 3 Community License |
| SOC2 | ✓ | ✗ |
| HIPAA | ✗ | ✗ |
| GDPR | ✓ | ✗ |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | ✗ |
Benchmark Results
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash | Llama 3.1 8B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 93.4 | 87.4 | Gemini 1.5 Flash |
| BBH | 71.7 | 67.1 | Gemini 1.5 Flash |
| GPQA | 38.5 | 34.8 | Gemini 1.5 Flash |
| GSM8K | 75.2 | 58.8 | Gemini 1.5 Flash |
| HUMANEVAL | 67.5 | 63.4 | Gemini 1.5 Flash |
| IFEVAL | 68 | 62.1 | Gemini 1.5 Flash |
| MATH | 53.2 | 31.1 | Gemini 1.5 Flash |
| MMLU | 76 | 73 | Gemini 1.5 Flash |
| MUSR | 46.1 | 41.7 | Gemini 1.5 Flash |
| WINOGRANDE | 78.9 | 77.6 | Gemini 1.5 Flash |
Pricing Comparison
| Tier (per Mtok) | Gemini 1.5 Flash | Llama 3.1 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $0.075 | $0.18 |
| Output | $0.3 | $0.18 |
| Cache Read | $0 | $0 |
| Cache Write | $0 | $0 |
Gemini 1.5 Flash против Llama 3.1 8B
Обзор модели
Gemini 1.5 Flash and Llama 3.1 8B are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.
Ключевые характеристики
| Поставщик | Дата выпуска | Окно контекста | Лицензия |
|---|---|---|---|
| Google / Meta | 2024-05-14 / 2024-07-23 | 1000K / 128K | Proprietary / Llama 3 Community License |
Производительность
| Бенчмарк | Gemini 1.5 Flash | Llama 3.1 8B | Победитель |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 93.4 | 87.4 | A |
| BBH (BIG-Bench Hard) | 71.7 | 67.1 | A |
| GPQA | 38.5 | 34.8 | A |
| GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K) | 75.2 | 58.8 | A |
| HumanEval | 67.5 | 63.4 | A |
| IFEval | 68.0 | 62.1 | A |
| MATH | 53.2 | 31.1 | A |
| MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) | 76.0 | 73.0 | A |
| MUSR | 46.1 | 41.7 | A |
| WinoGrande | 78.9 | 77.6 | A |
Сравнение цен
| Вход | Выход | Чтение кэша | Запись кэша |
|---|---|---|---|
| — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
за миллион токенов — A / B
Сильные стороны & Слабые стороны
Gemini 1.5 Flash
- ✅ 支持文本、图像、音频多模态输入。
- ✅ 上下文窗口 1000K，支持长文本。
- ⚠️ 闭源专有模型，不支持自托管。
Llama 3.1 8B
- ✅ 可靠的通用模型。
- ⚠️ 闭源专有模型，不支持自托管。
Мнение редактора
Gemini 1.5 Flash and Llama 3.1 8B each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.
ЧЗВ
Which model is better for coding tasks?
Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.
Which model is cheaper?
Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.
Which has a longer context window?
Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.
Ссылки
Editor's Take
See Editor's Take section.