Phi-3 Vision vs GPT-4o: Benchmark Comparison
Detailed comparison of Phi-3 Vision and GPT-4o covering benchmarks, pricing, context window, and compliance.
Key Specifications
| Specification | Phi-3 Vision | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | other | openai |
| Version | phi-3-vision | 4o |
| Release Date | 2024-05-21 | 2024-05-13 |
| Context Window | 4096 tokens | 128000 tokens |
| Input Modalities | text, image | text, image, audio |
| Output Modalities | text | text, audio |
| License | MIT | Proprietary |
| SOC2 | ✗ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | ✗ | ✓ |
| GDPR | ✗ | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | ✗ | ✓ |
Benchmark Results
| Benchmark | Phi-3 Vision | GPT-4o | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 77.4 | — | Phi-3 Vision |
| BBH | 40.1 | 83.1 | GPT-4o |
| GPQA | 17.4 | — | Phi-3 Vision |
| GSM8K | 30 | 95.8 | GPT-4o |
| HUMANEVAL | 48.2 | 90.2 | GPT-4o |
| IFEVAL | 56.4 | — | Phi-3 Vision |
| MATH | 24.3 | 76.6 | GPT-4o |
| MMLU | 56.4 | 88.7 | GPT-4o |
| MUSR | 32.1 | — | Phi-3 Vision |
| WINOGRANDE | 74.7 | — | Phi-3 Vision |
Pricing Comparison
| Tier (per Mtok) | Phi-3 Vision | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $0.2 | $2.5 |
| Output | $0.2 | $10 |
| Cache Read | $0 | $1.25 |
| Cache Write | $0 | $2.5 |
Phi-3 Vision ضد GPT-4o
نظرة عامة على النموذج
Phi-3 Vision and GPT-4o are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.
المواصفات الرئيسية
| المزود | تاريخ الإصدار | نافذة السياق | الترخيص |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other / Openai | 2024-05-21 / 2024-05-13 | 4K / 128K | MIT / Proprietary |
أداء المعايير
| المعيار | Phi-3 Vision | GPT-4o | الفائز |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 77.4 | — | A |
| BBH (BIG-Bench Hard) | 40.1 | 83.1 | B |
| GPQA | 17.4 | — | A |
| GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K) | 30.0 | 95.8 | B |
| HumanEval | 48.2 | 90.2 | B |
| IFEval | 56.4 | — | A |
| MATH | 24.3 | 76.6 | B |
| MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) | 56.4 | 88.7 | B |
| MUSR | 32.1 | — | A |
| WinoGrande | 74.7 | — | A |
مقارنة الأسعار
| الإدخال | الإخراج | قراءة الذاكرة المؤقتة | كتابة الذاكرة المؤقتة |
|---|---|---|---|
| — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
لكل مليون رمز — A / B
نقاط القوة & نقاط الضعف
Phi-3 Vision
- ✅ 支持文本、图像、音频多模态输入。
- ⚠️ MMLU 仅 56.4，知识推理偏弱。
- ⚠️ HumanEval 48.2，代码能力较弱。
- ⚠️ 闭源专有模型，不支持自托管。
- ⚠️ 上下文窗口 4K 偏小。
GPT-4o
- ✅ MMLU score 88.7, strong knowledge reasoning.
- ✅ HumanEval 90.2, excellent code generation.
- ✅ GSM8K 95.8, robust math reasoning.
- ✅ 支持文本、图像、音频多模态输入。
- ⚠️ 闭源专有模型，不支持自托管。
رأي المحرر
Phi-3 Vision and GPT-4o each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.
الأسئلة الشائعة
Which model is better for coding tasks?
Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.
Which model is cheaper?
Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.
Which has a longer context window?
Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.
المراجع
Editor's Take
See Editor's Take section.