Llama 3.1 70B vs Qwen2.5 72B: Benchmark Comparison
Detailed comparison of Llama 3.1 70B and Qwen2.5 72B covering benchmarks, pricing, context window, and compliance.
Key Specifications
| Specification | Llama 3.1 70B | Qwen2.5 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | meta | alibaba |
| Version | 3.1-70b | 2.5-72b |
| Release Date | 2024-07-23 | 2024-09-19 |
| Context Window | 128000 tokens | 131072 tokens |
| Input Modalities | text | text |
| Output Modalities | text | text |
| License | Llama 3 Community License | Qwen License |
| SOC2 | ✗ | ✗ |
| HIPAA | ✗ | ✗ |
| GDPR | ✗ | ✗ |
| ISO 27001 | ✗ | ✗ |
Benchmark Results
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 70B | Qwen2.5 72B | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 92.3 | — | Llama 3.1 70B |
| BBH | 70.2 | 82.4 | Qwen2.5 72B |
| GPQA | 40 | — | Llama 3.1 70B |
| GSM8K | 78.8 | 88.4 | Qwen2.5 72B |
| HUMANEVAL | 79.7 | 86.6 | Qwen2.5 72B |
| IFEVAL | 73.7 | — | Llama 3.1 70B |
| MATH | 38.5 | 83.1 | Qwen2.5 72B |
| MMLU | 75.6 | 86.1 | Qwen2.5 72B |
| MUSR | 48.1 | — | Llama 3.1 70B |
| WINOGRANDE | 81 | — | Llama 3.1 70B |
Pricing Comparison
| Tier (per Mtok) | Llama 3.1 70B | Qwen2.5 72B |
|---|---|---|
| Input | $0.9 | $0.5 |
| Output | $0.9 | $0.8 |
| Cache Read | $0 | $0 |
| Cache Write | $0 | $0 |
Llama 3.1 70B ضد Qwen2.5 72B
نظرة عامة على النموذج
Llama 3.1 70B and Qwen2.5 72B are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.
المواصفات الرئيسية
| المزود | تاريخ الإصدار | نافذة السياق | الترخيص |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meta / Alibaba | 2024-07-23 / 2024-09-19 | 128K / 131K | Llama 3 Community License / Qwen License |
أداء المعايير
| المعيار | Llama 3.1 70B | Qwen2.5 72B | الفائز |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARC | 92.3 | — | A |
| BBH (BIG-Bench Hard) | 70.2 | 82.4 | B |
| GPQA | 40.0 | — | A |
| GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K) | 78.8 | 88.4 | B |
| HumanEval | 79.7 | 86.6 | B |
| IFEval | 73.7 | — | A |
| MATH | 38.5 | 83.1 | B |
| MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding) | 75.6 | 86.1 | B |
| MUSR | 48.1 | — | A |
| WinoGrande | 81.0 | — | A |
مقارنة الأسعار
| الإدخال | الإخراج | قراءة الذاكرة المؤقتة | كتابة الذاكرة المؤقتة |
|---|---|---|---|
| — / — | — / — | — / — | — / — |
لكل مليون رمز — A / B
نقاط القوة & نقاط الضعف
Llama 3.1 70B
- ✅ 可靠的通用模型。
- ⚠️ 闭源专有模型，不支持自托管。
Qwen2.5 72B
- ✅ MMLU score 86.1, strong knowledge reasoning.
- ✅ HumanEval 86.6, excellent code generation.
- ✅ GSM8K 88.4, robust math reasoning.
- ⚠️ 闭源专有模型，不支持自托管。
رأي المحرر
Llama 3.1 70B and Qwen2.5 72B each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.
الأسئلة الشائعة
Which model is better for coding tasks?
Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.
Which model is cheaper?
Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.
Which has a longer context window?
Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.
المراجع
Editor's Take
See Editor's Take section.