Key Specifications

SpecificationGrok-2Llama 3.1 405B
Vendorxaimeta
Version23.1-405b
Release Date2024-08-132024-07-23
Context Window131072 tokens128000 tokens
Input Modalitiestext, imagetext
Output Modalitiestexttext
LicenseProprietaryLlama 3 Community License
SOC2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001

Benchmark Results

BenchmarkGrok-2Llama 3.1 405BWinner
BBH8482.9Grok-2
GSM8K93.289.2Grok-2
HUMANEVAL88.489Llama 3.1 405B
MATH76.873.8Grok-2
MMLU87.588.6Llama 3.1 405B

Pricing Comparison

Tier (per Mtok)Grok-2Llama 3.1 405B
Input$2$5
Output$10$15
Cache Read$0$0
Cache Write$0$0

Grok-2 ضد Llama 3.1 405B

نظرة عامة على النموذج

Grok-2 and Llama 3.1 405B are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.

المواصفات الرئيسية

المزودتاريخ الإصدارنافذة السياقالترخيص
Xai / Meta2024-08-13 / 2024-07-23131K / 128KProprietary / Llama 3 Community License

أداء المعايير

المعيارGrok-2Llama 3.1 405Bالفائز
BBH (BIG-Bench Hard)84.082.9A
GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K)93.289.2A
HumanEval88.489.0B
MATH76.873.8A
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding)87.588.6B

مقارنة الأسعار

الإدخالالإخراجقراءة الذاكرة المؤقتةكتابة الذاكرة المؤقتة
— / —— / —— / —— / —

لكل مليون رمز — A / B

نقاط القوة & نقاط الضعف

Grok-2

  • ✅ MMLU score 87.5, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 88.4, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 93.2, robust math reasoning.
  • ✅ 支持文本、图像、音频多模态输入。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Llama 3.1 405B

  • ✅ MMLU score 88.6, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 89.0, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 89.2, robust math reasoning.
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

رأي المحرر

Grok-2 and Llama 3.1 405B each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.

الأسئلة الشائعة

Which model is better for coding tasks?

Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.

Which model is cheaper?

Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.

Which has a longer context window?

Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.

المراجع

Editor's Take

See Editor's Take section.