Key Specifications

SpecificationGPT-4oGemini 1.5 Pro
Vendoropenaigoogle
Version4o1.5-pro
Release Date2024-05-132024-02-15
Context Window128000 tokens2e+06 tokens
Input Modalitiestext, image, audiotext, image, audio, video
Output Modalitiestext, audiotext
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
SOC2
HIPAA
GDPR
ISO 27001

Benchmark Results

BenchmarkGPT-4oGemini 1.5 ProWinner
BBH83.184Gemini 1.5 Pro
GSM8K95.891.7GPT-4o
HUMANEVAL90.271.9GPT-4o
MATH76.658.5GPT-4o
MMLU88.785.9GPT-4o

Pricing Comparison

Tier (per Mtok)GPT-4oGemini 1.5 Pro
Input$2.5$1.25
Output$10$5
Cache Read$1.25$0.3125
Cache Write$2.5$1.25

GPT-4o ضد Gemini 1.5 Pro

نظرة عامة على النموذج

GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro are both notable options in the AI model market. This page compares their benchmarks, pricing, and compliance.

المواصفات الرئيسية

المزودتاريخ الإصدارنافذة السياقالترخيص
Openai / Google2024-05-13 / 2024-02-15128K / 2000KProprietary / Proprietary

أداء المعايير

المعيارGPT-4oGemini 1.5 Proالفائز
BBH (BIG-Bench Hard)83.184.0B
GSM8K (Grade School Math 8K)95.891.7A
HumanEval90.271.9A
MATH76.658.5A
MMLU (Massive Multitask Language Understanding)88.785.9A

مقارنة الأسعار

الإدخالالإخراجقراءة الذاكرة المؤقتةكتابة الذاكرة المؤقتة
— / —— / —— / —— / —

لكل مليون رمز — A / B

نقاط القوة & نقاط الضعف

GPT-4o

  • ✅ MMLU score 88.7, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ HumanEval 90.2, excellent code generation.
  • ✅ GSM8K 95.8, robust math reasoning.
  • ✅ 支持文本、图像、音频多模态输入。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

Gemini 1.5 Pro

  • ✅ MMLU score 85.9, strong knowledge reasoning.
  • ✅ GSM8K 91.7, robust math reasoning.
  • ✅ 支持文本、图像、音频多模态输入。
  • ✅ 上下文窗口 2000K,支持长文本。
  • ⚠️ 闭源专有模型,不支持自托管。

رأي المحرر

GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro each have their strengths. Choose based on workload (code, long context, vision), referencing the tables above.

الأسئلة الشائعة

Which model is better for coding tasks?

Refer to the HumanEval benchmark table; the model with a higher score is better suited for coding tasks.

Which model is cheaper?

Refer to the pricing comparison table above; the model with lower input/output prices is more cost-effective.

Which has a longer context window?

Refer to the key specifications table; the model with a larger context window is better for long documents.

المراجع

Editor's Take

See Editor's Take section.